Was the Appellate Commissioner justified in dismissing Petitioner's appeal on jurisdictional grounds due to lack of service on adverse parties when Petitioner had no adverse parties?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) Was the Appeltate Commissioner justified in dismissing Pertihones 6 Appeal on +he jutisdichenal gcound of the Ineed for service of the Filed notice of appeal vpon al adverse parties — when, as Petihener made it cleac in their Filed notce of apptal, omd as it was hue, based on the fact of Respondent not being adverse, +hey never having appeared in any lower Ciroulk Cause proceedings (+hene being none held), nar yn the case at all, never having been served OF summoned (the lower Curcult Court ease Montiag been dismissed Cor wont of erosecuchon, for lack of Service wpon or appearance of Rospandent) 7 fe 2) was the Oregon Supreme Court justified in refusing We grant eview~ even though the Appellate Commissvanes's dismusal was Lompletely arbitrary and Wiywatified by the law e age 2 of 1 Wejazi VDowntown Eugene, Inc,