Was the Appellate Commissioner justified in denying the application for appellate court filing fees?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I) Was the Appetlate Commissioner justified in having denied ferihones’s application for appellate Court Fiting feeg—on the basis of “given al the cittumstances, including . the number of civil app pals which have been Lied by appellant only to be dismissed by the Court fer various YeasonsS and lack of any colovable claim of ercoc here... '? 2) Was the Appettate Commissioner justified in dismissing Retihoner’s appeal on the ‘ucisdictrenal grounds of need for Service | of the filed notice of appeal vpon all adverse pathes—when, as Peritwner made it clear in theic filed notice of appeal, and as was kue, based om the fact of Respondents not being adverse , hey Never Naving appeored im any lower CiCouit Coust proceedings (thece being none held \; nor in the case at all, never having been secved or summoned (tne lowes circus Cousk Case having been dismissed for want of prosecution, fee lack of Service oF Appearance of | Respondent)? upon 3) Was the Oveg on Supceme Court justified in fefusing to grant review—even tough the Appellate Commissioner's dismissal was Completely atbitrary and unjustified by tne low 2 Page 2 of 13 Hejazi Vv. Rios; etal.