No. 21-5769
Joseph R. Dickey v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2244(b) 2255 60(b) actual-innocence circuit-court-interpretation federal-prisoners habeas-corpus innocence newly-discovered-evidence statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
ERISA HabeasCorpus
ERISA HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-11-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Has the 11th Circuit constructed a legal framework that acts as a de facto suspension of habeas corpus?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. In light of the fact that actual innocence supported by newly discovered evidence is a gateway for habeas relief, has the 1ith Circuit constructed a legal framework for federal prisoners that / acts:as a de facto suspension of habeas corpus by applying 2244(b)/ (1) to claims of innocence while also | precluding any revisitation, or use of innocence in a 60(b) motion when there is newly discovered evidence? 2. Does 28 U.S.C. 2244 (b)(1) apply to filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255? ,
Docket Entries
2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Joseph R. Dickey
Joseph R. Dickey — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent