No. 21-5772

Charles Eason v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court armed-career-criminal-act chemical constitutional-challenge conviction criminal-procedure drug-classification drug-manufacturing remand sentencing-enhancement serious-drug statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-11-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When the Appellate Court of a chemical that 'could' be used to manufacture a 'serious drug' is remand required?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ‘ I. : When the Appellate Court Of A Chimical that "Could" be used to Manufacture as : a "Serious Drug" is Remand Required ? PIL. If a defendant's prior conviction was part of One Continuance Crime Spree "Without" Intervening7 | Arrest and further "Consolidated" for one sentencing purpose,can a court construe the prior as Seperateconvictions based soley on the dates-the offenses and prior to any arrest béing made or entry of a conviction to deem the defendant an Armed Career Criminal If Not is Remand for Resentencing required? : If a State Statute is "Overlybroad, overlyinclusivevor "indivisble" is it Unconstitutional to apply an enhancement ° pursuant to the ACCA 18 U.S.C. §924(e)? . ! : j

Docket Entries

2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Charles Eason
Charles Eason — Petitioner
Charles Eason — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent