Did the Ninth Circuit Court and the District Court overlook a clear procedural rule?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Did the Ninth Circuit Court and the District Court completely overlooked a clear procedural rule proving that the respondents filed an untimely response to petitioner’s motion for reconsideration and that the respondents consented and conceded as in (Skrabec v. . Town of North Attleboro, F3d (1% Cir. 2017)? ‘ (2) Did the Ninth Circuit Court overlooked that the district court abused it’s discretion in denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration which was filed under Rule (59), and Local Rule; 7-18, when the respondents failed to request for an extension of time and thereby filed an inexcusable untimely response to the motion? (3) Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously ruled in its Memorandum that “The district court did not abuse its discretion : in denying reconsideration because Baah failed to demonstrate any basis for relief? (4) Weather or not the District Court Abused Discretion in dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice when on November 2, 2016, the court signed an order to refer the case to an ADR Procedure No.2, to be completed by August 22, 2017? . (5) | Was petitioner’s notice of appeal pertaining to the motion for o Disqualification and Reconsideration for Disqualification untimely as to those orders?