No. 21-5775

Peter George Noe, aka Ghost v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2021-11-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in denying the petitioner's motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QQ) : 4. A : $ DA on O ‘ a 2S\ la aN a\alole ke S\\ a tang’ im khe ve nk SU Stem of gost | eavickien relief doc Ved RS OW ‘a O ¢ a : A\\ Dac ye ONCE CN La we . p wats QAAC ~ ; ‘ ’ — ! | a : “ae \\ | “ . | OCLAion Be\ors _ (1) Co ne Lona eNawe! 2 Xo % VSs an avi. (3) a — Qeasen Sec acantiag Mee wok en ee a tes ey \ Ce “Tove of Au Abeer rN od | waited ekes V Picanol 23d S43 562 Ws nit-2 0 At S VW Morgan » \A-S5602 Sle $_& | ‘\ SL Ws ASU | SahueS and rrleco. Ze WSec 25S GS Lp oy 2 A ‘ai MALCZAE ; fe Ta he Qroceme, Co of Ane wae ee. Ch 5 axe a & « ‘ AS t . eis. on 5 ut of cecr 0AS ee . Pe dS 6 & ES? ow OC AA rote oe of ecw ros aw w\ 4 e th | : 4 ie Awe We . ANS CAN oc Vou. OVAL ON 2 Vou Cone of agecoa\Ss ks Ke Eran sh | | x AS AS ak ayoennhs x C to | maiye Qh Soke S Con ie) o OZ AWW SA eneacine On aS oN We Wav & g aS¢ | Wwe S SAK CAL © ef *\W Ow’ ‘ espe Ww | ToaveKe ck mnt LG UW 8-C° a S79 . | | . | a naSMAG Sonal and Stati ts Q oD \ Op : \ d <a 6: Dror Queceio ADA AR We . AW vwearxst acs GS \ (A) 28 wse 2255S. Amen dmen 282 | : S\arkeame oX he Coase. Pasa Or Sahys Oi Ars | mrnihei\ne erccessS i \Wis ¥-Sas so Wis criminal Wistac ! woe. hernia he a Criminal Wisies yyHe2 erco ne oN Catkag Ss La gosed" See Prrany Vo waned ese eccecsedad wine Ara dene, Vande ee A ; . . 5 Sodey X of kha OS*. ; Woes Quiidel\ne ex<Co aCe Neos , Anda Ace D Com irztawle on MCLG avo2zoan\ o in 28 -$-¢ LSS \becanse ANAL Pi Can Td ye Could howd alsen* : We excocSsS Oo oC& avocalo\e Senkence Worl da le imposed.” Xv ol ra 2 Se AN N “ o> YV\ Aw ie v\ ASeEA Amendmen 3 Or UW\noys : OLON _~w Wee OAL Wars in oo atk TS WAS Made — edge ACN S . oe. = Ove NACC Budra GQuaera oS\ (A) = we exe NS, OAc ond \WwvoK¥ed Xhe Wiahk CoucsS walang in Marea yokyeFS VO Moraan o \a.S. So Ke) ~ CT 2 ASL AWAY VAT _ ky ananed 0 When *he Searencing OM 9 810 20S Rend Vey 182 _ _ & | | stake evr of CASE : | and made Ww vero WON | eosed a “krue aag' i he XR Sie of p05 eavicitc vee fe Amendmenk WA V\oweced oes of Sense \eve\ Ww ao level | , | Thos ade he exrocS +r aller Sulbssantial wants because \ ne 2CCoe ee oc ce ed oe | i helae Canae mid be 3B24-Ys . MmenkhS 6 \eve 30 coh TY we . MOnics Conc he Med, = COW —— Wo xne uses of Pradiba Querelo Sentencing Ate esnlyi OO (() | S Ws : at Qc : > O wite © Ko be yy, r4 fet A Sa om ee CO ie Q

Docket Entries

2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Peter G. Noe
Peter George Noe — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent