Whether a district court can, sua sponte and without any question of suspicion, order a pretrial defendant to urinate in front of a bailiff as a condition of continuing their case?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED [TS 6 district court authorized te, sua Sponte, but without a. Warrant OF ony question OF suspicion , ordera pretrial deferdomt whose. band Qareement contains No special Condtians related to doug testy ork who hos al realy been ot Harty without an isene ten muiths, 1 Uninate in Frat o& a bailiin o Wuthase bathroom aS & Cuntition o& carhhtung is cage? L.To hak exteit con pretrial deferdonts rely on theeuprees COntiticns of ther Lond? “2 \Whal onethe norrexpress cordikuns pretrial dekenderrts inglicHy consentde 08 Wrditens of veleace! 4 Ts altishicdcourt quthoriredto impose, thewoct 2xtrome criminal pentlty , feyocatian of bol ond remmd to jall without setting anewtord , Within mitudes Korderny the defendant to provide said urine Somple Without aMfudig O Fair opportunity to covtest the reailt othe test or vomiting inte He record bnything to support fhe Guten boty of the. tec?