No. 21-5781

Adelaide Lorin Scurlock-Zindler v. Peter Henry Zindler

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-09-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process family international-human-rights judicial-misconduct marriage military military-jurisdiction state-department-intervention
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why were the Respondent and I, as civilians, permitted to get married and renew our vows on an active-military-carrier, bringing family-and-friends aboard as our-guests, having-a-military-command-including-the-ship's-Captains-as-our-personal-attendants?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Questions Why were the Respondent and I, as civilians, permitted to get married and renew our vows on an , active military carrier, bringing family and friends aboard as our guests, having a military | command including the ship’s Captains as our personal attendants? | Why was the Respondent permitted to manipulate the Bahraini legal system to obtain Islamic judgments against me and my daughter by defaming my professional reputation in pediatrics, as well as my personal character as a mother, and why did the Embassy, State Department, U.S. Courts, and others back him, in violation of our civil rights, International human rights, right to due process...? | ; Why do so many high-ranking military officers, government employees and foreign service workers all “owe him one” as he put it, and how do these American tax funded relationships } promote the purpose for which our dollars are allocated to these public servants? | Why have so many Bahraini officials, Obama-Biden appointees, unelected employees in the | U.S., overseas, in D.C., even carrying into the Trump, and now Biden-Harris administrations | ‘ acquiesced to the Respondent’s whims in obstructing our ability to receive justice, despite us : being American citizens sent on official U.S Department of Defense business? Why are judges across the country permitted to sit on the bench without oversight or accountability, when their rulings put our children in harm’s way, get them trafficked, cause them to commit suicide... and despite judicial officers being jailed for these illegal court order | schemes filmed in the 2013 documentary, Kids for Cash, why are they able to simply override . | sentencing to wound up back on our streets? ‘

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Adelaide Lorind Scurlock-Zindler
Adelaide Zindler — Petitioner
Adelaide Zindler — Petitioner