Does a pattern and practice exist whereby appellate courts refuse to adjudicate every issue presented by the Class of unrepresented litigants appealing issues arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?

Questions Presented for Review | Question 1. Does a pattern and practice exist whereby appellate courts refuse to adjudicate EVERY ISSUE presented by the Class of unrepresented litigants appealing issues arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges? Question 2. Since involved district judges know unrepresented victims have no access to substantive, meaningful appellate relief, does such setting itself constitute a separate violation of the due process rights of victims? Question 3. Should my Coram Nobis Motion be restored to the criminal case in which it belongs, and the Hon. Judge Scriven be recused? Darst Petition for Certiorari Circ. To Terminate Practice of courts of appeal REFUSIN( ADDRESS EVERY ISSUE RAISED, and to Re-Enter Coram Nobis Motion into Crim Case, & Etc. Pg. 2 |