No. 21-5797
George Verkler v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-misconduct plea-agreement presumption-of-innocence right-to-appeal right-to-counsel sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment Securities Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment Securities Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-11-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the presumption of innocence and due process mean that if a judge will not read what a defendant in a criminal case submits to the court, or if the prosecution admits the Defendant is actually innocent that the judge must rule in favor of the Defendant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : i
Docket Entries
2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2021)
Attorneys
George Verkler
George Verkler — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent