No. 21-5800
Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. Idaho
Tags: atkins-standard Atkins-v-Virginia clinical-assessment clinical-standards conflict-between-lower-courts constitutional-interpretation criminal-sentencing death-penalty intellectual-disability national-concern sub-average-intellectual-functioning
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Atkins v. Virginia require the use of clinical standards for the determination of sub-average intellectual functioning?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), require the use of clinical standards for the determination of sub-average intellectual functioning? PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI — Page i
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-10
Reply of petitioner Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. filed.
2021-10-28
Brief of respondent Idaho in opposition filed.
2021-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr.
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner
Idaho
L. LaMont Anderson — Idaho Attorney General's Office, Respondent
L. LaMont Anderson — Idaho Attorney General's Office, Respondent