Did the district court err in allowing testimony via two-way interactive video over confrontation objections due to witness' COVID-19 concerns?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the district court err when it allowed testimony via two-way interactive video on foundational or "factual scenario" grounds over confrontation objections, due to witness' claim of COVID-19 concerns. 2. Whether an adult non-witness interpreter's testimony via two-way interactive video of defendant's alleged factual statements, adequately preserves the trier of ‘ fact's observation of witness' demeanor, specifically during cross-examination.