No. 21-5813
Anthony Foster v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: categorical-approach general-verdict habeas-proceeding harmless-error-review predicate-offenses Stromberg-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the categorical approach be used in a habeas proceeding to evaluate which of several predicate offenses support a jury's general verdict?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Should the categorical approach be used in a habeas proceeding to evaluate which of several predicate offenses support a jury’s general verdict? (2) After Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57 (2008) are all Stromberg errors subject to harmless error review? ii INTERESTED PARTIES The following is a
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Anthony Foster
Randee Jill Golder — Randee J. Golder, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent