Are Federal judges at liberty to unilaterally issue rulings and orders based on personal political preferences, in addition to race and class bias, when the relevant facts and laws are not favorable to those personal preferences?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Are Federal judges at liberty to unilaterally issue rulings and orders based on personal political preferences, in addition to race and class bias, when the relevant facts and laws are not favorable to those personal preferences? "2. Does the court's undue delays, contrary to the Code Of Judicial Conduct, in order to render a request for a preliminary injunction moot, thereby avoiding the merits and facilitating dismissal, qualify as a dismissal on the merits for purposes of satisfying the doctrine of res judicata? 3. Can the doctrine of Prudential Standing shield defendants from accountability for conduct the congress has determined to be felony crimes potentially punishable with imprisonment and substantial civil penalties? 4. Does the media have the legitimate right or responsibility to filter political messages and platforms for appropriateness to be seen and heard by the general public, particularly when filtering is influenced by the conflict between the interests of American voters to be fully informed and the commercial interests of the media to increase profits and revenues from campaign advertising funds of candidates?