No. 21-5821

In Re Eduardo Pineda

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-09-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process liberty liberty-interest marijuana-regulation police-power strict-scrutiny
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the constitutional right to 'liberty' as contained in the due process clause still mean freedom from physical restraint by government police power?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED [1] Does the constitutional right to "liberty" as contained in the due process clause still mean freedom from physical restraint by government police power? [2] Are the operations and effects of federal marijuana laws an Article III case and controversy subject to the strict scrutiny judicial review standard? {3] Is being incarcerated a substantial denial of the Petitioner's constitutional right to liberty considering Congress' proscription of marijuana as a dangerous substance fails to provide due process of law in violation of Amendments IV and V of the Constitution : of the United States? . : 4 . : | . . : . . | | ‘ ii So |

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-08-13
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

In Re Eduardo Pineda
Eduardo Pineda — Petitioner