Whether the South Carolina Supreme Court erred in concluding that the trial court's decision to exclude the testimony of the defendant's expert witness violated the defendant's constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause and the Compulsory Process Clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | UNnethar the. South Csroline Su prennt C ourt Zsror te ah Orr tha trral CO osuid's vuclinn cuslaere the coat a Clourk Uses Convinced You the sda “hired parks | anit ' ery wthet alfran BIAS qty, heared [ ana diminish alDwrcn's athe mot tea erove Wis 4 WASCOMCO 6 a CanstT TUT one | rs ot ts presantd «& Com plearte ale Renasa aroundked in Due Vrecess, C on Cronhakt ea; and Qogalsory “Pre cess, | l