No. 21-5847
Arthur Lee Lewis v. California
IFP
Tags: due-process jury-trial presumption-of-innocence proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment statutory-sentencing statutory-sentencing-range
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentence within the prescribed statutory range but inconsistent with the jury's verdict complies with the Sixth Amendment jury trial guarantee or the Due Process right to the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Review is requested to determine whether a sentence within the prescribed statutory range but inconsistent with the jury's verdict complies with the Sixth Amendment jury trial guarantee or the Due Process right to the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt 1
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Arthur Lewis