Daniel Bryan Kelly, Jr. v. California
Securities Immigration
Why wasn't I allowed to face my accuser and cross-examine at trial?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a . ‘ ; | @ Why Wasnt © allowed to face my accuser of CfoSSexamine Am ak trial ? e Why wouldat MY Attorney S3 Mack StaPleton, Travis Stroud and MePhen Klarich, listen to Me and oc File Motions when instructed Ahem +o clo So ? © Why Did StePhen Klarich MY Attomey Violate hs Contract bY Nat Fiiina MY OPenwna Brief that FE Served him on 9-13-18? 22? — Brief is Attached # See exhort (A) © When L told MY Attorney Travis Stroud that TL Wanted to face. MY ACCUSOL aNd Questia him ON the Stand, Why wWauldat MY attorney listen to Me % and Subpoena MY ACCUSECME Smith ® In this Case the only eve witness i a Mt Yeacald Child Why clid the Judge Deny My Motion fora ComPetentcy Evaluation ? On the Child ? @ Why woulda}d Tudse Deems allaw my AttomeyS Mahon to form She Jucy that tne \\ Year old Child WitnesS Was Any on Cobovoerv¥eS with hiS Lather, e Why wouldad Judge Deems allow the Jury 40 Know that My ACCUSEC IS a GanG Member, SEX Offender oF a child, ANd Was Goma on Cobberies With the Child Witness in MN Coase ? . @ Why wasn't © allowed to Presenta defense and of evidence Directly Celated to the credi biltty of the Child Witness ard hrs fokher MY accusoc ? -@ Why Wouldat the TudgeS o¢ Governec listen ta me and my Family 2?? @ Why wasnt I allowed a faictrial ? so — QUESTIGN(S) PRESENTED a il) WHY Werent A MY LtneSseS AWawed bo testify of] ak my trial 2 a | e 3 || why dcd the D.A. Kimbecly Memiihs USe Com| _[Puter Sobeware and Choe & Alter my Jail || Prone CallS and disPlay MiStaformatan +o | »|| the Saucy? | , 6 a | Why was the DA. allowed to Use ChoPPed and} || atteced Prone Calls, take my wWotdS out of , | Context and tamer With Stale evidence to | OWN a Coavichan ? . | eo | When'd Fiied a ee MoloN and Presented , levidence to Judge deems, Why did he deny my a Motion) ? . . ou | Why did Tadae DeemS ianore MohoaS tha I | Pited. and fanore Pre StodrementS Hat Were Sent) to hm and the DA. ° . ev || Why did at Sudae DeemsS order a New trial when re The Cecieved Statements ftom New wiinesseS ? 3 | Why was X dented the Maht to Presenta deF| vo | ense ? | o 2. || Why Wouldat my APPeal Attorney File my Supe) wo Wemental Brive 2 This Bre IS attached exhbit(A) " oo [Why Would At MY AdPeal Aklaney (aise The rss || ued Prat T instructed him +o Carse ¢ eo wT nated He CouMs that Mme Karch Bribed land extorted me, Why did the Courts fail to », || ack on this infacmation ¢ . @ 2x Why was T denied the Caht to effective Counsel ?