Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals deprived jurisdiction from the Fourth Circuit Appeals Court to renew petitioner's Rule 60(b) appeal motion

ESTIONS PRESEMTED—— NIOLATE PetirioWe RS CONSTITUTIONALLY CURRAUTEED DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY 7 DENYING PETITIONER ACESS Te TWE COURTS. oo 4) wn WE Distect Coury FoR THE BW EEASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Malate Petitioner's ConsttionALLY GUARANTEED DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY DEMING PET Tone ACCESS To THE COURTS. | (5) Di THE UNITED STATES FOURTH ClRCVT OF WE EASTERN Disteict OF WIRGINIA Commit A MISCARRIAGE OF Susie rr ~~ QUESTIONS PRESENRT ED — , : Towaeps THE PET M\oNERS DOE TRocess | RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL Feez0omMs (6) VE PENWTIONER PRoves A RULE S9CE) MOTION WAS SCOT CARTIFIED MAIL. TWMELY To THE COURTS, THEN WY DOESNT ; Te Uvereo States Cour oF APPEALS FOR THE Fou@TH CI@CUIT HAVE THe — DVRISDICTION To DEAIOE A RUIE | LOCB) APCEA\_.