No. 21-5858
Enrique E. Quintana v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence collateral-attack commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure indictment indictment-deficiency plea-agreement waiver
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
actual-innocence,plea-agreement,waiver,indictment,collateral-attack,commerce-clause,gonzales-v-raich
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Gan a defendant who claims actual innocence after entering a plea agreement be barred from raising his actual innocence claim based on a Plea Agreement Waiver? | 2. Does a fatally deficient indictment overcome a Plea Agreement waiver to restrict a defendant's ability to collaterally | attack his conviction? 3. Gan a Gommerce Clause regulation be maintained as Constitutional under the aggregate market effect of Gonzales v. Raich when it is shown that there is no National Market to effect? )
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent