Whether Petitioner seeking a COA demonstrated a substantial showing of the denial of a Constitutional right

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner seeking a COA demonstrated a substantial showing of the denial of a Constitutional right and that’ jurist of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling under test . Slack v. McDaniel,529 U.S. 473,483 (2000). 2. Whether the district court properly dismissed all seven habeas claims on the basis they were barred’ by the AEDPA statute of limitations. . 3. Whether district court and Court of Appeals 9th Cir. correctly detirmined that appellant failed demonstrating a prima facie case. 4. Whether the Courts correctly detirmined that appellant had failed to make a sufficient showing of ineffective assistance of counsel as grounds for untimely appeal of conviction to! merit further proceedings on that issue in the court. 5. Whether district court correctly detirmined that appellant had failed to make a sufficient showing of Brady material showing “actual innocence" to merit further proceedings on that issue in the district court and U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Cir. ; 6. Whether the Court correctly detirmined that petitioner : was in custody under conviction or sentence under attack at the time petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed. ; 7. Whether the District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit standard of review was deficient with relevant decisions of this court and erred denying petitioner's _ properly stated rule of law. i ‘. . :