Ryan Russell Parks, aka Dinero v. United States
As the amended charge of 'SQ' (33) a constructive amendment?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) As dhe amended charge of \SQ\ (33) a constructive antadtandk ? 2) Ag Khe covapounding of ‘Charge 1952 @) (3) aiding ayad olztking Ye pro ohion oa business iaveiving proskitation before yey yaskrudtions Yuk after deig 4 shated, Xe all charaes Visked in indidtment to lower Vrere burden Constitute a covstoacte : amend vane 7 : a , \ . A " A Pp : ED) \5 the charge of 1SAl fe) lavwtal aS \ pot, cobs Hot deh endacd oka alfic mokve Acdkeast \yot aise, dakes away an escaXiol. cena ot dda creeau what | putting A ia dhe paras hands ko dckrenee whak is ones ey vag ober evned te a esis be ; of ccagon asks ogpeckunity yo Vike 54 nd fachee more Wat fort tha Leehins, ok , Sgvaznue daetett dele cane ane T 4) DA dae Judge cre on Hac exocubion ok volt SAS wacn “ sogeed hee de A : Leora asking cevclant ores ews Yak ted weiany, jo dlo writ Sf Ouy vay Tee ‘ alleged wadliwa geviacieh ne V : : 5) Did be defendant <xpeciance a variance in evidence ichen ak trial the yados added | of cided and abcthed \o the original indictment based en the prosecution's belt thet the defendant was trying te pat alledged crime on another PRION oe persons: