Whether District Court departed from essential requirements of law by not perfecting service on Petitioner in a timely manner, which denied constitutional rights of due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether District Court, departed from essential requirements of law, by not perfecting service on Petitioner in a timely manner, which denied constitutional rights of due process. 2. Whether Petitioner was denied right to conflict free counsel at Evidentiary hearing on Newly Discovered Evidence. 3. Whether Petitioner’s case was a true self defense, based on swor affidavit, of Cedric Johnson, sidebar conferences, evidence and investigative reports. | | | | | | 58] |