No. 21-5879
Dheadry Powell v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court district-court-discretion first-step-act guidelines justification money-laundering resentencing sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under the First Step Act, did the district court fail to provide a sufficiently compelling justification that thoroughly explains its above the guidelines resentencing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTIONS PRESENTED I. UNDER THE FIRST STEP ACT, DID THE DISTRICT COURT FAIL TO PROVIDE A SUFFICIENTLY COMPELLING JUSTIFICATION THAT THOROUGHLY . EXPLAINS IT’S ABOVE THE GUIDELINES RESENTENCING? Il. UNDER THE FIRST STEP ACT, DID THE DISTRICT COURT MULTIPLY PROHIBITED MONEY LAUNDERING ENHANCEMENTS THAT INCREASED PETITIONER’S UNDERLYING OFFENSE LEVEL?
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan and Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-04
Motion (21M7) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted. Justice Kagan and Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2021-07-14
MOTION (21M7) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-03-26
Motion (21M7) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2021-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Dheadry Loyd Powell
Dheadry L. Powell — 11033-031, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent