Does Due Process and Liberty Interest exist in Nevada's Disciplinary Proceedings, and when Disciplinary Proceedings are Constituted is Due Process Violated?

Was the Petitioner's Constitutional Right of Presenting a Defense Violated because Denied Witnesses, Medical and Incident's Reports and Reviewed of evidence being used against him is a Denied Due Process?

Was the Notice of Charges insufficient that Insufficient Evidence was used against him to convict Petitioner for Due Process?

The recitation of the evidence used to convict a Petitioner as "State Report" only as a Violation of Due Process?

Is a Violation of Due Process only the Disciplinary Chairperson, used Petitioner's alleged attorney Disciplinary history against him?

Is it a Double Jeopardy Violation such it included a new Disciplinary Hearing and Charges on Petitioner Pact even when the Charged Disciplinary Hearing replaced reason Disqualified?

Record held his Disciplinary and Judicial Rights were Violated and his Extent to Relief?

Because the Petitioner was Denied his Filed Stamped copy of a Proposed Gag Order he was Court Ordered to Submit and so and the Proposed Gag Order is a acknowledged in the Record on Appeal as being Filed does these occurrence Violate Due Process?

Did the District Court abused its discretion in Striking From the Record the Petitioner's Reply to the Respondent's Answer Reply For Writ of Habeas Corpus; and this Reply is ALL in the Record on Appeal can this Court too Declare consider this Reply back Nevada Supreme Court is egregious did Petitioner's substantial Rights to Present his Habeas Corpus is establish he is Entitled to Relief despite a Evidentiary Hearing?

Is a Violation of Due Process the District Court or Nevada Supreme Court did not Rule on a Petitioner's new District Court Letter of ceasing to the Jurisdiction of a Writ Receding of the new Disciplinary?

Does Due Process and Liberty Interest exist when Nevada's Disciplinary Proceedings violate Due Process?