No. 21-5895

In Re David Angel Sifuentes

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-10-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure banister-v-davis case-precedent constitutional-provisions judicial-review mandamus mandamus-petition rule-21 rule-60(b) rule-60b-motion sixth-circuit-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the Sixth Circuit required to docket Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus and apply Banister v. Davis to Petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Is Sixth Circuit required to docket Petitioner’s Wirt of Mandamus filed around August 10, 2021 and the Rules of Appellate Produce Rule 21 require the clerk to immediately docket and present the petition to the Court of Appeals Judges. Petitioner “Yes” II. Is the Sixth Circuit required to apply the case of Banister v. Davis, 140 S.Ct. 1648 (2020) to Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion. Petitioner “Yes” -)

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-09-10
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2021)

Attorneys

David Angel Sifuentes
David Angel Sifuentes III — Petitioner
David Angel Sifuentes III — Petitioner