No. 21-5901
Shawn R. Erpelding v. Scott Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aedpa aedpa-limitations civil-judgment due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief postconviction-relief pro-se pro-se-application state-criminal-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether pro se applications to vacate and set aside a state criminal judgment toll the limitation period under the 'properly filed' clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether pro se applications to vacate and set aside a state criminal , nonsupport judgment and its direct counterpart civil judgment tolls the limitation period under the "properly filed" clause of 28 U.S.c. § 2244(d)(2), Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA")? 2. Whether pro se postconviction relief movants in Nebraska should be held to the same stringent standards as one who is represented by counsel? i
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-26
Waiver of right of respondent Scott Frakes to respond filed.
2021-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Scott Frakes
James A. Campbell — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent
James A. Campbell — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent