Should the defendant be awarded for criminally entering a false document that was used by the Court's Officer as evidence as a result of attorney misconduct under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Should the defendant be awarded for criminally entering a false document that was used by the Court’s Officer as evidence as a result of attorney misconduct under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)? 2. Should a state court of appeals be responsible for refusing to new evidence upon appeal to correct evidence entered by the Petitioner under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60? Virginia Court of Appeals denied the Petitioner’s written review that included evidence of the correct document that reflected the name of the petitioner’s company in a workers’ | compensation case. 3. Should a judge be sanctioned when they willingly accepted a false document used in rendering a court decision under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3)? The judge accepted a false document into evidence that did not represent the company on the docket | and was used in making the decision to deny workers’ compensation benefits. | 4. Whether the merits of this case based on procedural defect require resolution by this Court? As pro se, the petitioner was not granted the opportunity to correct the defects of his petition to the Virginia Court of Appeals. . 5. Should the U.S. Supreme Court stand up for citizens entitled to a fair trial? | i