No. 21-5914

Tony Joseph Tabor v. Vincent Coleman

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights discovery due-process free-speech retaliation standing
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-03-25 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's First Amendment rights were violated due to retaliation for his speech when the defendants used chemical agents against him

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented . . OY Hewes the. Petitonee Suppose to _ , = Penowop Ehou te Comper the wis [FoR Discovery wher only hag congnt, ot, grade cpecial. eolucation education? a Buns the PebitoneR’s Fikst omerdmeny — Piolaked becauseWe Wasshown — Reraliakton fees gpeecn when [The DeFenclaws Specs himtoth chemtcal agents Awice dust Cause HE was tal l\ra @ Ho arokhee oFfendleR two CellS clown From. 7 che unless comething iS trying tole hidden. Kas he vicko Footage t)eeor heen produce! ; —. ardviewel by eCourse wed heck OWN Power” to howe the veoh Cou) YS — Ruidence proc uced aS 16 Vitel to | \ oo Case thercoF re eee Vo ieteteesaptne jn gegeiatnag. Counse\ when, Gounse) —}sobrvicusly needed _ TH iTiiclaget caging A Denacl — PTO Hetifnd RR ducal feFleck — — Mec moana, CL Sos cloes the Defendant —Vieceet Colman haut fering agains ee | eS ~~ feltanthePelvone@ tae 0 folyqmbetest | me | rove Hea et Felling theta bere in IN) HepaCome oltrough 1S Jolicy mental Meath mesic pret clin chia | gents tuere Usecl omanotferdel Yhati__ ___ oasncthurhing WinnselEoR anyone else? BYR Belo lo Modu yples poe ewe Sgjod ge ierene a _Hhat.Would helped Petitioners Case hee inalso seffpectinaelli erste = pease! A -.@ |S) TantheekendontS Couneel'be Founel 9 ——rsacthags te Video Fogteeg there of ar _ N14) Can oF Bicees bs aNlpasecip qiossls _Continue te LSe awrel algass tt RMS pon psec a ae 5 Howtoeg alc tsk een chemed ole “pseal.on Woman welhiao'elosed area! so __|___|G) IF Ake chemical ages Can Clearly Shales _|Pone.use.on Nurnans, Do nat 0seol in claokS _— Croce.used! tial Should Soppoct malice Rqhit___ —ieiinRaaelolag iment eee —4 _ Dok youPnin tt usould haye been produced Ne te a bull ton Barre Synckrom etha Woeak KespeR tory TO Paseemtael tho being lnc hy iach “a Sayed uirce with more thin acne Second —i@)uconld abe Clee es diny Fact Findee dl malice _foasanissuz hece thus. a6 @m mR TARR wes __ pled inan obseniationtell eh tole A ~— ——§laiLuoithits 0107 Corser. Fe Ps protection? — ohms chil adios Caan Crab also Receive elie Fromhisilleral Conviction of _—__ OS\e only akiGhbime oFfendek worth previous Convichtors_ —-@ —_ foknoavicleat offences enpunc ed Fron lis Recorol _ the Doce MO 442949. cutil oF Me3aDCOR —ovisianet? ea __alViE*ke courts gave me TAGoR wohice Yack , lS mokion FoR a needed to gate the Defendouts Counsel Ti He filed Prem dhthe Courts dhs ee FE ell erated ——— a Se eee Ck deed oe peioelockdaon wlan tastes tke passat hee ee ees _. mre decasion oF the Unileel Stokes Courok ___|Bopen\s FoR the FiFt Cubcurt plese see 9 _ The copy allached thereok-to tas Petition a Tne udgrate oF the kel Stns. Cut fof ee Repésls Fok the EHC. Cahn eritted oe On BAOS00 02\ on ovleKlenying Qo EE idfeoriucsenteelon wa dQ \ocopy ofboth Thereof. a JAR el con 5 Covert oy — AUS. C1854) Lb —fpastihmenal and Staion} — po <P ase nual Agence VL to the — United states Constitution hide trovidles.. _ |The

Docket Entries

2022-03-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-01-04
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent Vincent Coleman to respond filed.
2021-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Tony J. Tabor
Tony Joseph Tabor — Petitioner
Vincent Coleman
Andre' Charles CastaingLA Dept. of Justice, Respondent