No. 21-5916

Ramiro Medina-Oliden v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: alleyne almendarez-torres appellate-procedure apprendi constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process precedent-analysis sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183). No. In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2021 RAMIRO MEDINA-OLIDEN, Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Ramiro Medina-Oliden asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on May 18, 2021.

Docket Entries

2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 5, 2021)

Attorneys

Ramiro Medina-Oliden
Judy Fulmer MadewellFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Judy Fulmer MadewellFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent