No. 21-5921
Shikisha Monet Tidmore v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: admissibility constitutional-rights due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-enforcement-statements legality pre-trial-investigation sixth-amendment trial-counsel voluntariness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's constitutional rights have been violated under the United States Constitution VI Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Oe ; Whether Petitioner’s constitutional rights have been’ violated under the United States ” . Constitution VI Amendment where Petitioner was denied due process and ineffective assistance of counsel. Trial counsel failed to conduct basic pre-trial investigation into the statements that _ : Petitioner made to Officer Corstage and Detective Knight. Additionally, trial counsel failed to challenge the voluntariness, legality, and admissibility of those statements made.
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Shikisha Monet Tidmore
Shikisha Monet Tidmore — Petitioner