No. 21-5927

In Re Lindsey Orr

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-10-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights congressional-authorization detention-authority due-process federal-law first-time-offender legislative-intent patent standing statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Thomas Act have legislative authorization to generate by means of implementation their holding that stashing FAZCO's towards first time offenders was proper based upon Congressional statutory patent?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L. The Following Question Ls Based Urin The Fact That Lxeertional Lireumstantes Warrant The Exereise OF The Louct’s Distretionary Powers — Bosed Uron This Extraocdinacy Writ ReauestrAnd That Adequate Relief Lannot Be Qbtained In Any Other Levrt Brcause The Petitioner Or Would Like To Know Did The Thomas kee DealHave hegislative Authorization To Generate By Means §f Leplementation Their Holding That Staehing faZHCO's Trwards First Time Offenders Was Proper Based Upon ——— Gonaressionel StatufocyTatent?. 2 Did beascess Ever Authorize The Lemposition Of StrarKins Jeno Ty words Non-Retidivists First Time Offenders 6f pa2ucu?, g. Vader What Pact Of The hawful FAZUCE) Provision Provides. Authorization To The Attorney General And The Federal Bureau Of Prisons To du stain The Petit loner Ore Ta Lustady Based Uron Federal Lansressional hesislation’s Latent Asa Eitst Time Offender? ()

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-30
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

In Re Lindsey Orr
Lindsey W. Orr — Petitioner