whether-the-kansas-state-court-finding-that-petitioner-sentence-is-not-an-illegal-sentence-is-an-abuse-of-discretion-repugnant-to-the-due-process-clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , I. WHETHER THE KANSAS STATE COURT FINDING THAT PETITIONER SENTENCE TS NOT AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE, A ABUSE OF DISCRETION REPUGNANT TO THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 14TH AMEND; MENT PROTECTIONS IN SENTENCING PHASE?. Lecce ence ccc c ccc ccc rnccaeeed, TI. WHETHER THE KANSAS STATE COURTS WITHHOLDING OF ITS DISPARITY IN SENTENCE BENEFITS FROM PETITIONER, AMOUNT TO THE DENIAL OF EQUAL ; PROTECTIONS OF THE LAW, THUS REPUGNANT TO THE 14TH AMENDMENT OF THE 1 Oa: aaa 0) III. WHETHER PETITIONER REMAINING IMPRISONED ON CRIMES COMMITTED : BY CODEFENDANTS, THAT KANSAS. STATE COURTS HAVE LONG SINCE RELIBVED \ OF THE PUNISHMENT IMPOSED, BASED UPON FALSE & UNTRUE INFORMATION, (ABUSE OF DISCRETION) ‘AND AFOUL TO THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW, EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL, RENDER THE SENTENCE A FUNDAMENTAL MANIFEST MISCARRI-' | AGE OF JUSTICE?2. ccc csc ccs n ccc e reer ee see cee re eres esec