Whether the lower court abused its discretion by denying the petitioner's procedural claims, including the denial of access to the courts, failure to exhaust state remedies, and unnecessary litigation

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED " cient law Say anything the Jury did Mer hear is Mew a Vs the Court abustn there deCreation by VSsuiny deaied opder on Oro Cedural Acounes, 2s ont Feacliing the facts of Prisoner Constitutional C\taw ? 3 TS Mnere nok Subsranttal Showing of He denial of my Corstt tational Rights. Uy Will Yor Please get my Case Re Poot From the Texas OMA. Miktwre Project Beam otter Wt DT Giled with Court back in Kois? Ty srater Ad\ doa. & Ask Wink Mme too these CHIME ; 5. Why ald tus court ofder a respondents brieg BR that wih than Jeqiel ME, With Mut wei lin order b, Why doer Wis Process YK against Khe Petitioner? books “t al fine caer als J Filey becante ot te Texas DMA mix Proper tn na teon Cleared Or Ob all CHmey Yom have Wa FePorh in Prcuistes wer, 1. Shook me © a ike vn ne ‘otlaee slaclls and eX 2ibyt come Cronk wh G. Why Was ook oll evikeace of 'EXUIbIt eresenf to rhe Jury, 10, Who Shot Ecnesk Bloom Siela, and Why was his confession aot being cesrecked @ Ho Wow can lower court Find TL did an& exhaust Stale cemedicr Wher *hey Cank ocder a out of +ime PBR Awa lt Wes dus in Loot, and JY got cSt cepoct Crom Teves VMK in Lol? aad Ccesented Actugl raconcee Claim thea 4 . 1}. Ts hig nor UNelessaty Li H5ation® . . IS. Alen Ssvell did a PDQ. orm ont Case, Craiy Wwoskiagin vd got oa re OME, Why WS Re PpR® a Wrue Wher LT hast & Anno lerce Clem bared of Har COL [eAok Your have Cr File ia (ecutovs wit Nhat Mun ofdr ce sto Were ony , IH. Te noe Waving Yo 5% Aroigh Myss errCess yor hawed me oF Vin Neatioand 15, shonW Mok VT have hag only One Avarl jrbey tfiel me Awree Sof COME Wat hoya ah ba Savac Wnt, IL. To Hye Court abusing thee decenrie® boy Clavaring + have underdy by Congevtubonl Claim Th lest or New tr tne aire BUSt vor Heaney daar ShoWk Wave itn Called ko ATTY ang Work We o My hawt