No. 21-5943

Brandon Ward v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-2253 appellate-counsel certificate-of-appealability character-evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel trial-counsel use-of-force witness-testimony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on his claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to retain and present a “use of force” expert. 2. Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on his claim that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to argue on direct appeal that the state trial court erred by preventing him from presenting witnesses to testify regarding one of the alleged victim’s character trait of violence. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Brandon Ward
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner