Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to timely comply with a pretrial order to provide a prompt plea offer

No question identified. : @ , | | STATEMENT OF LESUES UN APPEAL | LZ. Whertlen TRIM Caw. Was INEFFECTIVE Fer FILING Ti ADE GnMaLY Comey A Prempl. PLA OFFER Wp L73 Texus tal Cinotiials Tl, WHETAR TRI Conese WAS TUEPFETING fixe FREI ETO OBJECT Ws . ADU SIBLE TESTIMONY? tl, Whew Ted. Colac Whe RPE TIVE Foe Fon TO UBM TO PEETULED TESTINIONY USD BY THE Peasualin) 7 _ , A WHEW Thal Conez. Wits THEPIETIVE FOR FELLING TO CBT 1 Whe Feostecatlinds ws GE DGG fF HaTION By Wlay OF Ne HT MAGI Zhe. P ies Bc tavccenin® PETTTINR /5 BOBBY TUE BERTON, PETITIONER WERE WHE PLANT PF INTHE Diste/1 COMET PLAINTIFF Weke MFPELLINT I THE COURT CEMOPEALS, Fore Y? Cal; ReSPpONCIO Mh SCOTT B. Lew, Wiebe AT PRY CORRECTIMUAL TST, Aa HIS RFTORNEYS, HESITANT 10 ATTORNEY CNL OF OF 5. Cy, Sit Sone Be COLE FMD MALLOY Tite: Behl (MO WETRE DEREVONTEAIPELLERS zy TH Comerorappas V9 Ctl DlapOwe 4) SC MIS, #2) 5,5, #3) Ghar Coutw Pats (tik. > (Kiger Ravens tae. FC), #4.) It 56/45) Dich; SCUBAMOHO, AC] Me UN SIE Ch MES OL RC M50 LK MYR, FR Fp seta Tlon Teh, FELD CASES MELE V, TEAS, 355 MS, 28, 8 5,¢: 03 (/75D Beal v; Stir€, YO 5¢ tet, Tes staal 4 (ditte 20H) DIWE V, SHTE, 38/ SC CU, 675 5, E:td, MoCSC,L001) Ut. v, Laban, 174 Ws, 50,0 Sc Se6(/995) Lafh RY, CUP SteUus, (5%, (325,64 1376 (20/2) MissOURPY, FRIE, ob U.S, 194, 18254-1899 (2/2) Wooler v, HALOHIN, 29 5 [13,55 3c HO/ 735) SHIKLANO Y, WasharcTOnls Hocus. bb 3, lod Se; 20521990) U3, V, HULL, 789 Ftd TM Us, Ch ME, #8 Clk, 1778) 413, \, Hine, S69 fed [13 [dems Mf, C3121 (17D WiLlants \. UnireD Store; 512 U5,51Y, IM 3.44 203070 I ©@ ®