Steven B. Baumgarten v. Erika Evans
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Is the U.S. Constitution and federal case law violated when a trial court erred in finding substantial evidence of two or more distinct, individual, noncontinuous occurrences of stalking when there was only one demonstrable instance of random contact
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Is the U.S. Constitution and federal case law violated when a trial court erred in finding substantial evidence of two or more distinct, individual, noncontinuous occurrences of stalking when there was only one demonstrable instance of random contact which can be proved and disproved there was any other? 2) Was my US constitutional right to disqualify a judge violated 29 U.S. Code §455 Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge to disqualify a judge 3) What does the Constitution say about perjury? What is the public interest , in all kinds of people taken down by accusations when false accusations false statement after statement which all 3 Ms. Levias, Ms. Evans, Ms. Sylvester all-knowing made proven false statements omissions and dishonesty to obtain that some can be proved? 4) Do US officials United States important to know the public interest of mental illness discrimination and the fact we are victim of crimes and often victims of false reporting are almost 50,000,000 mentally ill and 11,400,000 seriously mentally ill in United States | 1 : | f oe EE a 5) Does the Public Interest of systematic prejudice and selective prosecution against the mentally ill which cops’ courts city attorneys happen to me in , this case and pattern by the cops, judges and these exact city attorneys | against the mentally ill who are guilty of allowing not just me but the mentally ill in general to be victims of assaults (David Jones threatening me for decade before and after the night he chased me injured my brain) for instance. 6) Is ita NATIONAL PUBLIC INTEREST MARIJAUNA LAWS the CONFLICT OF INTEREST between FEDERAL and STATE LAWS and serious HEALTH HAZARDS MENTAL and PHYSICAL associated with , MARIJUANA that affects the mentally ill and all people in general. 7) Was the systematic prejudice against mentally ill in the court system a greater national public interest that has affected the mentally ill since the medieval times on a United States National level the green light to perjure in writing also in one false statement after another a factor in more than what just happened to me many other mentally ill people experienced and people in general have been victims of false accusations. 8) Was the Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution of the United States violated regarding excessive punishment. They know that I don’t know who 2 she is other than by name, which is why they put her on the phone in court. I have a brain injury and do not remember her the ESP checking question for Ms. Levias about other receptionists and later the 2nd ESP checking question of what happened remember don't remember Ms. Evans nor Ms. Levias not any of 8 female city attorneys in court. They put Ms.Evans on the phone because they know don’t know who she is other lady thought was her figured out was Ms. Sylvester a little better because she was saying all this false stuff. Was the 1000 foot permanent order in this not so big town till day I die EXCESSIVE INAPPROPRIATE to | random contact for 35 seconds maximum as proved where moved to the front left of the bus to be considerate to see Brent and a little mindless dribble (basketball) in park = when don't know who she is as they know when have Brain injury and already forgetting stuff and risk of dementia. : 9) PUBLIC INTEREST Was my constant unavoidable 2nd hand Marijuana , exposure and lack of sleep and concussion that caused my delirious exhausted constant fantasizing forgetfulness that reopened my schizoaffective mental illness caused decades ago by marijuana and exacerbated by marijuana. Was it taken into consideration? Do millions of other mentally ill people have same situation there mental illness is not understood or taken in consideration 3 : 10) Was Amendment XIV also right to travel and bias of court violated since I have no idea who she is, other than her name. Due to my mental illness I would not know who she is wherever I ran into her. | 11) Was my Constitutional Ist