Whether the USCRY has denied Petitioner access to the courts

No question identified. : OUEGTUONS — PRESENTED I. Cerliotart should issue to resolve whether the USCRY hos dented and is dun ying Détitioner access to the couils, during \ndigeit Petilones’s dnited States uphemne tout appeal” timeframe, in part via deutel of appointment of ‘new counsel, where appouted counsel strmgly eucoureged Petitioner To appeal, but quit tor personal’ weasons without acti’ te tw court, and where Pettlconer hes expressed need for assistance of counsel to proceed. % I. Ceitionan’ should tine to resolve whether the USCKH has denied Petitumer access te the cous, vie failure to strvig umcounseled Petition os a ‘legitimds cluut, cuctomen, pe party" seeking tnlormelion trom the wourt tut wes ard 15 considered wecessary in, orden to proceed, oth, alter a showing that the ‘assistence needed would wot likely, oe obtained Herc gla counsel ok recovd, and, alter showing counsel of recov had quit? MH. — Cerlatari should tssue to resolve wytlan Hu Oct hes denied ipdtyoat Petition access, t the courts, vie tile to properly Supervise the Duited Stakes Axtecct Couvt, fuctridt of South Cuwolina, declining to tuvestigato orien Peulmeds Metiov fo Stey gt He s patna welt 5 lina 9s Wt fsputr , wes ded aud donsidened ° by the Mag i stoe ta ank Wistnct Cowl yudgaes, and ik not, “why “. ’ wa |