No. 21-5969
Derrick E. Steilman v. Reginald D. Michael, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et al.
Tags: appellate-review due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-statute habeas-corpus ninth-circuit procedural-timeliness section-2254 standard-of-review statute-of-limitations timeliness
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it determined that Steilman's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is untimely?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it determined that Steilman’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is untimely? i
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent Reginald Michael, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Derrick Steilman
David Foster Ness — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
David Foster Ness — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Reginald Michael, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et al.
C. Mark Fowler — Office of the Montana Attorney General, Respondent
C. Mark Fowler — Office of the Montana Attorney General, Respondent