No. 21-5985
DeCarlos Titington v. United States
Tags: concurrent-sentences constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing discharged-sentences due-process equal-protection relevant-conduct sentencing-guidelines undischarged-sentences
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Equal protection and due process rights for discharged vs. undischarged sentences
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The federal Sentencing Guidelines treat discharged and undischarged sentences based on conduct relevant to a case before the court for sentencing differently. The Guidelines require the court to make the sentence concurrent to an undischarged sentence based on relevant conduct, but for discharged sentences only say that the court may adjust the sentence. Did the lower courts’ refusal to adjust Petitioner’s sentence for two discharged sentences violate Petitioner’s constitutional rights to equal protection and due process of law? 1 STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2021)
Attorneys
DeCarlos Titington
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent