Whether the Supreme Court of Virginia's Opinion that "there is no reversible error in the judgment complained of" in the Loudoun County Circuit Court's Order granting Summary Judgment and possession of Petitioner's property to PROF-2013-S3 Legal Title Trust (PROF) in an unlawful detainer action, properly addressed the questions regarding the rules on granting summary judgment or the constitutionality of the law, either under Virginia's Constitution or the Constitution of the United States, involving the life and liberty of Petitioner, and particularly to her Constitutional Rights to a "fair" trial by jury, and as to whether the Unlawful Detainer Statutes violate citizens' Constitutional Rights to Due Process, and, therefore, the constitutionality of non-judicial foreclosures, as noted in this case.

Whether the Supreme Court of Virginia's Opinion properly addressed the questions regarding the rules on granting summary judgment; or the constitutionality of the law, either under Virginia's Constitution or the Constitution of the United States, involving the life and liberty of Petitioner, and particularly to her Constitutional Rights to a 'fair' trial by jury; and as to whether the Unlawful Detainer Statutes violate citizens' Constitutional Rights to Due Process, and, therefore, the constitutionality of non-judicial foreclosures