No. 21-5994

Choo Washburn v. John Nunez, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitution constitutional-interpretation diversity-jurisdiction divorce-proceedings due-process erie-doctrine personal-property property-rights real-property takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Takings
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the meaning of the word 'PROPERTY' in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments indicate 'PERSONAL PROPERTY' or 'REAL PROPERTY

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED: 1. Does the meaning of the word, “PROPERTY” that is in the “Due Process Clause” and “Taking Clause”, in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and that is in the “Due Process Clause”, in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, indicate “PERSONAL PROPERTY” or “REAL PROPERTY”, OR either “PERSONAL PROPERTY” or “REAL PROPERTY”? 2. Can the “REAL PROPERTY/PRIVATE PROPERTY” that is ordered, in the Judgment of ; Absolute Divorce, to be sold, to divide the “MONEY/PROCEED” equally between the two parties, be “PERSONAL PROPERTY”? 3. Do the federal Judges have to protect the Petitioner's “Constitutional property right” that is protected under the “CONSTITUTION”, in the Diversity Jurisdiction civil case? | 4. Do the federal Judges have to apply the “2018 Maryland H.B. 956”: “Bill Summary”, | to the Petitioner’s Claim, in the Civil Case, in the diversity jurisdiction, under the | “Erie Doctrine”? : In 2018, Maryland adopted the resolution of “the Financial Crimes against | Elderly 2018 Legislation”, and Maryland further “Authorizes a victim of a certain offense to bring a Civil Action(see, APP.#, as reference) for treble damages ‘ against a certain person; establishes that a certain criminal conviction is not a prerequisite...”, under the “2018 Maryland H.B.: 956”: “Bill Summary”. | 5. Can the Federal Judges apply the MD Crim. Law Rule “Section 8-801(f)”, in the “MD Criminal Law Rule Section 8 — 801. Exploitation of Vulnerable Adults Prohibited”, to Petitioner’s Claim, in the Civil Case, in the Diversity Jurisdiction? and “Section 8801(f)” states: | “(f)Construction of Section, This Section may not be construed to impose : criminal liability on a person who, at the request of the victim of the offense, the victim’s family, or the court appointed guardian of the victim, has made a good faith effort to assist the victim in the management of or transfer of the victim’s ; property.” ! 6. Do the Federal Judges have to apply “the Judgment of Absolute Divorce/Divorce : Decree” that is entered in the state, and the state laws, that are relevant, to the Civil : Case, in the Diversity Jurisdiction, under the “Erie Doctrine”, and “CONSTITUTION”? 7. When the Federal Judges violate a party's “Constitutional property right”, in the Civil , Case, in the Diversity Jurisdiction, do their Orders in the Case, have to be voided? ft | .

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2021)

Attorneys

Choo Washburn
Choo Washburn — Petitioner
Choo Washburn — Petitioner