No. 21-6009
Jose Moyhernandez, aka Yindo v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-split crack-cocaine criminal-resentencing criminal-sentencing first-step-act sentence-reduction sentencing-factors statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentencing court must consider applicable sentencing factors codified in 18-U.S.C.-3553(a) when deciding whether to impose a reduced sentence on a crack offender eligible for a sentence reduction under the-First-Step-Act-of-2018
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether a sentencing court must consider applicable sentencing factors codified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) when deciding whether to “impose a reduced sentence” on a crack offender who is eligible for a sentence reduction under § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018 -an issue that divides the circuits. i
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-30
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Concepcion</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-18
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Jose Moyhernandez
Darrell Bernard Fields — Federal Defenders of NY, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent