No. 21-601

Michael B. Ellis, et al. v. Amy Berman Jackson, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: anti-injunction-act appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process irs judicial-review pro-se-litigation record-falsification standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question 1: Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges? Question 2: Did the Circuit Court of Appeals fail to carry its de novo burden to prove, in support of Judge Kelly’s holding, that Congress’ enactment of the AntiInjunction Act stripped courts of power to review the institutionalized falsification of IRS records concerning targeted Americans? | | | oo .

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent Berman Jackson, Amy, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Berman Jackson, Amy, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Michael B. Ellis, et al.
Michael Ellis — Petitioner
Michael Ellis — Petitioner