Michael B. Ellis, et al. v. Amy Berman Jackson, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question 1: Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges? Question 2: Did the Circuit Court of Appeals fail to carry its de novo burden to prove, in support of Judge Kelly’s holding, that Congress’ enactment of the AntiInjunction Act stripped courts of power to review the institutionalized falsification of IRS records concerning targeted Americans? | | | oo .