No. 21-6011
Robert Leslie Stencil v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adversarial-defendant clean-energy criminal-procedure defendant-prejudice due-process fraud-intent prejudice severance trial-severance
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process is violated when a trial court denies a motion to sever the trial, resulting in prejudice to petitioner
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether due process is violated when a trial court denies a motion to sever the trial, resulting in prejudice to petitioner because an adversarial defendant becomes a second prosecutor and the evidence supports petitioner’s position that he never intended to defraud, but instead created a legitimate business seeking to promote clean energy vehicles. i
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Robert Stencil
Joseph Bart Gilbert — Tarlton Polk PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent