No. 21-6023

Dina Elizabeth Guardado v. Eric Aldridge, Warden

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2021-10-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process legal-ethics standing
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court-appointed lawyer violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to investigate the allegations and by interfering with the investigation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . , 7 Why did Mr Price Kech a . Staze at Séntenang TRU, that Td done. these allegations ¢ Q How 1s ct that hé was } aSSigned to be ry Cour€ OPPurcted Lawyer? yehen Rule Il? / of vA Rules of Professional conduct states: (See Attached p(t) oe 3 did Mr Price. Koch | | ed gueston further 4 regardeng +R. 172 lnes FS | | as ee Me pivelbhss Ae Lead in veStigakom who took , down th® Careras QWwteKS — Delore the Cries 7 H Wh did he urkeryect stoev ak SR, yy Line |e , , howeng Written the letters Ok TR, 4IB, Lines 20-2) ,

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent Eric Aldridge to respond filed.
2021-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Dina Elizabeth Guardado
Dina Elizabeth Guardado — Petitioner
Eric Aldridge
Michelle Shane KallenVirginia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent