Whether respondent waived/forfeited procedural defenses

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER RESPONDENT WAIVED/FORFEITED ANY OF IT’S PROCEDURAL DEFENSES IN McGIRT’S DECISION AND RESPONDENT IS PROCEDURALLY BARRED FROM ASSERTING ANY IF IT’S PREVIOUS PROCEDURAL DEFENSES , THAT WERE AVAILABLE AGAINST PETITIONER’S SUBJECT MATTER | JURISDICTION CLAIM IN COLLATERAL POST CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS | WHEN CONVICTON WAS FINAL? | WHETHER McGIRT V. OKLAHOMA ANNOUNCED A NEW VINDICATIVE REPLACEMENT OF SUBSTANTIVE RULE DICTATED BY PRIOR PRECEDENT MADE RETROACTIVE BY TEAGUE’S EXCEPTION TO NON-RETROACTIVITY? WHICH RESPONDENT REFUSED TO APPLY RETROACTIVELY AS STATE POSTCONVICTION RELIEF TO CASES FINAL WHEN McGIRT WAS DECIDED ON JULY 09, 2020? , | WHETHER LACK OF TRIBES VOLUNTARY CONSENT TO STATE’S ASSUMPTION OF CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE ATEMPTED EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL | POWER BY RESPONDENT WITHOUT TRIBE’S CONSENT IS VOID? , . | | : | | ii , iz Z es | . |