No. 21-6039
Stanley Blair Hill v. Tennessee
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process expert-testimony junk-science scientific-evidence strickland-prejudice
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred in admitting unreliable scientific testimony and evidence, in violation of the petitioner's due process rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent Tennessee to respond filed.
2021-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Stanley Blair Hill
Stanley B. Hill — Petitioner
Tennessee
Garrett D Ward — Tennessee Attorney General's Office, Respondent