No. 21-6048

Shakina Ortega v. Higgs Fletcher and Mack LLP, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-10-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection impartial-court racial-discrimination self-representation self-represented summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-12-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the granting of summary judgment was proper when discovery was incomplete

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Court of Appeals’ decision to uphold the granting of the summary judgment motion when discovery was not complete, in conflict with the decisions of other appellate courts, which routinely reverse the granting of summary judgment motions when discovery was not complete, a violation of Petitioner’s Constitutional right to Equal Protection under the law? 2. Whether Petitioner as a Self Represented African American Citizen was denied her Constitutional Right to an impartial court? i ae | PARTIES INVOLVED All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. . . | ii

Docket Entries

2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-09
Waiver of right of respondents Higgs Fletcher and Mack LLP, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Higgs Fletcher and Mack LLP, et al.
Douglas A. PettitPettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin PC, Respondent
Shakina Ortega
Shakina Ortega — Petitioner