No. 21-6076
Lukeen Gerald v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c) crime-of-violence elements-clause hobbs-act hobbs-act-robbery predicate-offense sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation united-states-v-davis
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act Robbery remains a predicate crime of violence for 18 U.S.C § 924(c)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether Hobbs Act Robbery, 18 U.S.C § 1951 (a) remains a predicate crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C § 924(c) under the elements clause after the decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). i
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Lukeen Gerald
Luis A Ortiz — Law Offices Of Luis A Ortiz, Petitioner
Luis A Ortiz — Law Offices Of Luis A Ortiz, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent